Skip to content
Let's Talk

Pulp & paper Market ResearchCase 01 of 10

Why brands are, and are not, switching from plastic to paper packaging

A paper-based packaging manufacturer

  • RegionUnited Kingdom, Germany & France
  • Scope30 interviews, 220 survey responses
  • Timeline8 weeks
  • MarketsUnited KingdomGermanyFrance
Download the PDF Discuss a similar project
01

Industry overview

What is shaping pulp & paper

Paper and packaging demand is shifting from writing and printing grades towards packaging, hygiene and recycled products. Buyers are printers, converters, brand owners and schools, each with different priorities.

  • E-commerce is driving packaging demand
  • Recycled and sustainable grades are gaining preference
  • Price and delivery reliability dominate B2B buying
02

Client background

A paper-based packaging manufacturer, working in United Kingdom, Germany & France. Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

Organisation
A paper-based packaging manufacturer
Sector
Pulp & paper
Team engaged
Market Research
Services
Business panel, Qualitative research, Quantitative research
03

Client challenge

Regulation and consumer pressure were pushing brands to reduce plastic packaging, and the manufacturer expected strong demand for paper alternatives. Yet many prospects stalled after initial trials, and the sales team could not explain why.

04

Research objectives

  • Answer the core question: why brands are, and are not, switching from plastic to paper packaging.
  • Measure how widespread each pattern is, and explain the reasons behind it.
  • Give the client evidence it can act on within 8 weeks.
05

Target audience

Scope: 30 interviews, 220 survey responses.

Audiences we typically reach in pulp & paper

Printers and convertersPackaging buyers at brandsPaper tradersSchools and stationery retailersRecycling businesses

06

Geographic coverage

Coverage: United Kingdom, Germany & France. Markets: United Kingdom, Germany and France.

  • United Kingdom
  • Germany
  • France
07

Research methodology

A mixed-method design: structured research measured how widespread each pattern was, and qualitative conversations explained why.

  1. 1Brief
  2. 2Interviews with packaging and sustainability managers
  3. 3B2B survey
  4. 4Insight

We interviewed packaging engineers, procurement managers and sustainability leads at food, personal care and e-commerce brands, asking them to describe recent packaging decisions and trial experiences. A survey then measured how often each barrier appeared and how decisions were shared between teams. Interviews were conducted in English, German and French by researchers familiar with packaging terminology.

Business panelQualitative researchQuantitative research

08

Sampling strategy

  • Business respondents were screened on role, company size and involvement in the decision before being invited.
  • Online respondents were drawn from verified panel members who matched the screening criteria, with quotas on key profile attributes.
  • Qualitative participants were recruited purposively to cover the full range of experiences that mattered, rather than for statistical representation.
09

Data collection

interviews
30
survey responses
220
Brief & design Sampling & set-up Fieldwork Analysis Reporting Indicative split of the 8-week timeline.
  • The online survey was mobile-friendly and offered in respondents' languages.
  • Interviews and discussions were led by experienced moderators using a guide agreed with the client.
10

Data quality & validation

  • Digital fingerprinting and duplicate checks
  • Attention, speed and straight-lining checks
  • Review of open-ended answers
  • Recordings and transcripts for every session
  • Re-screening of qualitative recruits
  • Logic and range checks on the final data
  • Work carried out under our ISO 20252 quality procedures
11

Data analysis

  • Cross-tabulation by key groups and locations
  • Significance testing on the differences that mattered
  • Thematic coding of interviews and discussions
  • Journey and decision mapping
12

Key findings

  • Barrier properties, line speed on existing packing machines and cost per unit were the main obstacles, not willingness to change.
Sustainability created interest, but technical confidence closed the deal.
13

Recommendations

  • Build on the core insight: sustainability created interest, but technical confidence closed the deal.
  • Focus effort where the evidence was strongest: barrier properties, line speed on existing packing machines and cost per unit were the main obstacles, not willingness to change.
  • Re-measure after the changes to confirm the effect.
14

Business impact

  • The manufacturer created a technical trial service that ran samples on customers’ own lines and published barrier performance data, which shortened sales cycles for new accounts.

What changed in the business as a result of the work. Impact is described qualitatively.

15

Deliverables & next steps

  • Insight report and management presentation
  • Cleaned data file and data tables
  • Interview summaries and key verbatims
  • Repeat the measure after changes are in place to track progress.
  • A natural follow-on question: how do schools and parents choose notebooks?

Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

More pulp & paper case studies

  1. 02caseA satisfaction programme for printers and convertersA paper and board mill
  2. 03caseUnderstanding tissue and kitchen towel buyersA tissue products brand
  3. 04caseImproving waste paper collection from offices and householdsA recycled paper manufacturer
All pulp & paper case studies

Want results like these?

Tell us about your objectives. We'll recommend an approach and confirm feasibility within one working day.

Request a QuoteTalk to an Expert