Skip to content
Let's Talk

Fishing Market ResearchCase 06 of 10

Evaluating a boat modernisation scheme five years on

A central government programme

  • RegionTamil Nadu & Karnataka
  • Scope1,800 households, 40 case interviews
  • Timeline12 weeks
  • MarketsIndia
Download the PDF Discuss a similar project
01

Industry overview

What is shaping fishing

Fishing connects coastal communities, processors and exporters in a supply chain where freshness, ice and timing decide value. Livelihoods depend on seasons, regulation and access to cold chain.

  • Seasonal fishing bans and weather drive income cycles
  • Cold chain and processing determine export quality
  • Welfare schemes and cooperatives support fisher families
02

Client background

A central government programme, working in Tamil Nadu & Karnataka. Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

Organisation
A central government programme
Sector
Fishing
Team engaged
Market Research
Services
Government research, Quantitative research, Qualitative research
03

Client challenge

A scheme had subsidised engines and equipment for traditional boats. The programme needed an independent evaluation of whether beneficiaries were better off and what had worked or not.

04

Research objectives

  • Deliver on the brief: evaluating a boat modernisation scheme five years on.
  • Understand the views, needs and behaviour of households.
  • Measure how widespread each pattern is, and explain the reasons behind it.
  • Give the client evidence it can act on within 12 weeks.
05

Target audience

The work focused on 1,800 households.

  • households1,800

Audiences we typically reach in fishing

Fishers and boat ownersFish traders and auctioneersProcessors and exportersSeafood consumersCooperatives and scheme officials

06

Geographic coverage

Coverage: Tamil Nadu & Karnataka. Market: India.

  • India
07

Research methodology

A mixed-method design: structured research measured how widespread each pattern was, and qualitative conversations explained why.

  1. 1Brief
  2. 2Beneficiary and comparison surveys
  3. 3Case interviews
  4. 4Insight

We surveyed beneficiaries and a comparable group of non-beneficiaries in the same villages, collecting income, catch, fuel use and safety information. Case interviews explored how equipment was used, maintained and financed.

Government researchQuantitative researchQualitative research

08

Sampling strategy

households
1,800
  • Respondents were selected across Tamil Nadu & Karnataka using quotas set in advance for each location and respondent type, so no single area or group dominated.
  • Qualitative participants were recruited purposively to cover the full range of experiences that mattered, rather than for statistical representation.
09

Data collection

case interviews
40
Brief & design Sampling & set-up Fieldwork Analysis Reporting Indicative split of the 12-week timeline.
  • Trained local-language interviewers conducted interviews in person, supervised in the field.
  • Interviews and discussions were led by experienced moderators using a guide agreed with the client.
10

Data quality & validation

  • Back-checks on a share of completed interviews
  • Time and location checks on field interviews
  • Supervisor accompaniment in the field
  • Recordings and transcripts for every session
  • Re-screening of qualitative recruits
  • Logic and range checks on the final data
  • Work carried out under our ISO 20252 quality procedures
11

Data analysis

  • Cross-tabulation by key groups and locations
  • Significance testing on the differences that mattered
  • Thematic coding of interviews and discussions
  • Journey and decision mapping
12

Key findings

  • Beneficiaries reported longer fishing trips and better safety, but maintenance costs strained some households.
Comparison groups and honest case stories together give a fairer picture of impact than either alone.
13

Recommendations

  • Build on the core insight: comparison groups and honest case stories together give a fairer picture of impact than either alone.
  • Focus effort where the evidence was strongest: beneficiaries reported longer fishing trips and better safety, but maintenance costs strained some households.
  • Re-measure after the changes to confirm the effect.
14

Business impact

  • The programme added maintenance training and spare-part access to the next phase.

What changed in the business as a result of the work. Impact is described qualitatively.

15

Deliverables & next steps

  • Insight report and management presentation
  • Cleaned data file and data tables
  • Interview summaries and key verbatims
  • Evaluation findings with programme recommendations
  • Repeat the measure after changes are in place to track progress.
  • A natural follow-on question: how aware are fishers of welfare schemes?

Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

More fishing case studies

  1. 01caseA livelihood baseline for coastal fishing communitiesAn international development agency
  2. 02caseWhat international buyers expect from Indian seafood exportersA seafood exporters’ group
  3. 03caseMapping cold-chain gaps from landing centre to marketA state fisheries department
All fishing case studies

Want results like these?

Tell us about your objectives. We'll recommend an approach and confirm feasibility within one working day.

Request a QuoteTalk to an Expert