Industry overview
What is shaping fishing
Fishing connects coastal communities, processors and exporters in a supply chain where freshness, ice and timing decide value. Livelihoods depend on seasons, regulation and access to cold chain.
- Seasonal fishing bans and weather drive income cycles
- Cold chain and processing determine export quality
- Welfare schemes and cooperatives support fisher families
Client background
A central government programme, working in Tamil Nadu & Karnataka. Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.
- Organisation
- A central government programme
- Sector
- Fishing
- Team engaged
- Market Research
- Services
- Government research, Quantitative research, Qualitative research
Client challenge
A scheme had subsidised engines and equipment for traditional boats. The programme needed an independent evaluation of whether beneficiaries were better off and what had worked or not.
Research objectives
- Deliver on the brief: evaluating a boat modernisation scheme five years on.
- Understand the views, needs and behaviour of households.
- Measure how widespread each pattern is, and explain the reasons behind it.
- Give the client evidence it can act on within 12 weeks.
Target audience
The work focused on 1,800 households.
- households1,800
Audiences we typically reach in fishing
Fishers and boat ownersFish traders and auctioneersProcessors and exportersSeafood consumersCooperatives and scheme officials
Geographic coverage
Coverage: Tamil Nadu & Karnataka. Market: India.
- India
Research methodology
A mixed-method design: structured research measured how widespread each pattern was, and qualitative conversations explained why.
- 1Brief
- 2Beneficiary and comparison surveys
- 3Case interviews
- 4Insight
We surveyed beneficiaries and a comparable group of non-beneficiaries in the same villages, collecting income, catch, fuel use and safety information. Case interviews explored how equipment was used, maintained and financed.
Government researchQuantitative researchQualitative research
Sampling strategy
- households
- 1,800
- Respondents were selected across Tamil Nadu & Karnataka using quotas set in advance for each location and respondent type, so no single area or group dominated.
- Qualitative participants were recruited purposively to cover the full range of experiences that mattered, rather than for statistical representation.
Data collection
- case interviews
- 40
- Trained local-language interviewers conducted interviews in person, supervised in the field.
- Interviews and discussions were led by experienced moderators using a guide agreed with the client.
Data quality & validation
- Back-checks on a share of completed interviews
- Time and location checks on field interviews
- Supervisor accompaniment in the field
- Recordings and transcripts for every session
- Re-screening of qualitative recruits
- Logic and range checks on the final data
- Work carried out under our ISO 20252 quality procedures
Data analysis
- Cross-tabulation by key groups and locations
- Significance testing on the differences that mattered
- Thematic coding of interviews and discussions
- Journey and decision mapping
Key findings
- Beneficiaries reported longer fishing trips and better safety, but maintenance costs strained some households.
Comparison groups and honest case stories together give a fairer picture of impact than either alone.
Recommendations
- Build on the core insight: comparison groups and honest case stories together give a fairer picture of impact than either alone.
- Focus effort where the evidence was strongest: beneficiaries reported longer fishing trips and better safety, but maintenance costs strained some households.
- Re-measure after the changes to confirm the effect.
Business impact
- The programme added maintenance training and spare-part access to the next phase.
What changed in the business as a result of the work. Impact is described qualitatively.
Deliverables & next steps
- Insight report and management presentation
- Cleaned data file and data tables
- Interview summaries and key verbatims
- Evaluation findings with programme recommendations
- Repeat the measure after changes are in place to track progress.
- A natural follow-on question: how aware are fishers of welfare schemes?
Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.