Skip to content
Let's Talk

Shipbuilding Market ResearchCase 03 of 10

What ship owners value in a repair yard

A ship repair yard

  • RegionShip owners and managers in India, UAE, Hong Kong & Japan
  • Scope30 interviews, 110 survey responses
  • Timeline8 weeks
  • MarketsIndiaUnited Arab EmiratesHong KongJapan
Download the PDF Discuss a similar project
01

Industry overview

What is shaping shipbuilding

Shipbuilding and maritime services depend on a deep supplier ecosystem, skilled workforce and port infrastructure, with long project cycles and strict standards.

  • Supplier capability limits how fast yards can scale
  • Skilled trades are scarce and ageing
  • Port users judge performance on turnaround and reliability
02

Client background

A ship repair yard, working in Ship owners and managers in India, UAE, Hong Kong & Japan. Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

Organisation
A ship repair yard
Sector
Shipbuilding
Team engaged
Market Research
Services
Business panel, Qualitative research, Online surveys
03

Client challenge

The repair yard competed with yards in the Gulf and South-East Asia and was losing repeat business. It wanted to understand how ship managers chose repair yards and how it compared.

04

Research objectives

  • Answer the core question: what ship owners value in a repair yard.
  • Measure how widespread each pattern is, and explain the reasons behind it.
  • Give the client evidence it can act on within 8 weeks.
05

Target audience

Scope: 30 interviews, 110 survey responses.

Audiences we typically reach in shipbuilding

Shipyards and project managersMarine equipment suppliersSkilled workers and traineesPort users and shipping linesMaritime regulators

06

Geographic coverage

Coverage: Ship owners and managers in India, UAE, Hong Kong & Japan. Markets: India, United Arab Emirates, Hong Kong and Japan.

  • India
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Hong Kong
  • Japan
07

Research methodology

A mixed-method design: structured research measured how widespread each pattern was, and qualitative conversations explained why.

  1. 1Brief
  2. 2Interviews with technical superintendents
  3. 3Online survey
  4. 4Insight

We interviewed technical superintendents and fleet managers about yard selection, quotation practices, schedule reliability, quality and communication during repairs, then surveyed a wider group to measure the importance of each factor. Interviews were scheduled around vessel schedules and conducted by video with superintendents in several time zones, with all responses kept confidential.

Business panelQualitative researchOnline surveys

08

Sampling strategy

  • Business respondents were screened on role, company size and involvement in the decision before being invited.
  • Online respondents were drawn from verified panel members who matched the screening criteria, with quotas on key profile attributes.
  • Qualitative participants were recruited purposively to cover the full range of experiences that mattered, rather than for statistical representation.
09

Data collection

interviews
30
survey responses
110
Brief & design Sampling & set-up Fieldwork Analysis Reporting Indicative split of the 8-week timeline.
  • The online survey was mobile-friendly and offered in respondents' languages.
  • Interviews and discussions were led by experienced moderators using a guide agreed with the client.
10

Data quality & validation

  • Digital fingerprinting and duplicate checks
  • Attention, speed and straight-lining checks
  • Review of open-ended answers
  • Recordings and transcripts for every session
  • Re-screening of qualitative recruits
  • Logic and range checks on the final data
  • Work carried out under our ISO 20252 quality procedures
11

Data analysis

  • Cross-tabulation by key groups and locations
  • Significance testing on the differences that mattered
  • Thematic coding of interviews and discussions
  • Journey and decision mapping
12

Key findings

  • Schedule overruns and surprise cost increases were the main reasons managers went elsewhere.
  • Within a year, the yard was quoting with clearer scopes and several managers who had moved elsewhere returned for routine dry-docking.
Predictability won repeat business more reliably than lower prices.
13

Recommendations

  • Build on the core insight: predictability won repeat business more reliably than lower prices.
  • Focus effort where the evidence was strongest: schedule overruns and surprise cost increases were the main reasons managers went elsewhere.
  • Re-measure after the changes to confirm the effect.
14

Business impact

  • The yard introduced fixed-scope quotations with clear variation procedures and daily progress reports during dry-docking.

What changed in the business as a result of the work. Impact is described qualitatively.

15

Deliverables & next steps

  • Insight report and management presentation
  • Cleaned data file and data tables
  • Interview summaries and key verbatims
  • Repeat the measure after changes are in place to track progress.
  • A natural follow-on question: what would attract more skilled workers?

Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

More shipbuilding case studies

  1. 01caseIdentifying local suppliers for a shipyard’s localisation driveA commercial shipyard
  2. 02caseUnderstanding why skilled welders leave shipyardsA shipbuilding and repair company
  3. 04caseCommunity perceptions of a proposed port and shipyard expansionA port and shipyard developer
All shipbuilding case studies

Want results like these?

Tell us about your objectives. We'll recommend an approach and confirm feasibility within one working day.

Request a QuoteTalk to an Expert