Skip to content
Let's Talk

Aerospace Market ResearchCase 06 of 10

Testing changes to a frequent flyer programme

A South-East Asian airline loyalty programme

  • RegionMalaysia, Indonesia & Hong Kong
  • Scope2,000 frequent and occasional flyers
  • Timeline6 weeks
  • MarketsMalaysiaIndonesiaHong Kong
Download the PDF Discuss a similar project
01

Industry overview

What is shaping aerospace

Aerospace brings together airlines, airports, MRO providers and component suppliers, with safety, reliability and certification at the centre of every decision.

  • Passenger experience is a key differentiator for airlines and airports
  • MRO and component buying depends on certification and turnaround
  • Skilled talent is in short supply
02

Client background

A South-East Asian airline loyalty programme, working in Malaysia, Indonesia & Hong Kong. Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

Organisation
A South-East Asian airline loyalty programme
Sector
Aerospace
Team engaged
Market Research
Services
Quantitative research, Consumer panel, Research consultancy
03

Client challenge

The airline planned to restructure its loyalty tiers and rewards but feared alienating its most valuable members.

04

Research objectives

  • Deliver on the brief: testing changes to a frequent flyer programme.
  • Understand the views, needs and behaviour of frequent.
  • Produce results that can be compared across groups and locations.
  • Give the client evidence it can act on within 6 weeks.
05

Target audience

The work focused on 2,000 frequent.

  • frequent2,000

Audiences we typically reach in aerospace

PassengersAirline and airport managersMRO providersComponent suppliersEngineers and technicians

06

Geographic coverage

Coverage: Malaysia, Indonesia & Hong Kong. Markets: Malaysia, Indonesia and Hong Kong.

  • Malaysia
  • Indonesia
  • Hong Kong
07

Research methodology

A structured quantitative design, so results could be compared across groups, locations and time.

  1. 1Brief
  2. 2Online survey with choice exercise
  3. 3Insight

Members and non-members completed a survey including a choice exercise comparing alternative tier structures, earning rates and benefits. Results were analysed by travel frequency and purpose.

Quantitative researchConsumer panelResearch consultancy

08

Sampling strategy

frequent
2,000
  • Online respondents were drawn from verified panel members who matched the screening criteria, with quotas on key profile attributes.
09

Data collection

Brief & design Sampling & set-up Fieldwork Analysis Reporting Indicative split of the 6-week timeline.
  • The online survey was mobile-friendly and offered in respondents' languages.
10

Data quality & validation

  • Digital fingerprinting and duplicate checks
  • Attention, speed and straight-lining checks
  • Review of open-ended answers
  • Logic and range checks on the final data
  • Work carried out under our ISO 20252 quality procedures
11

Data analysis

  • Cross-tabulation by key groups and locations
  • Significance testing on the differences that mattered
  • Price and trade-off analysis
12

Key findings

  • Business travellers valued priority services and flexible upgrades far more than bonus points.
Choice exercises showed trade-offs that direct questions would have missed.
13

Recommendations

  • Build on the core insight: choice exercises showed trade-offs that direct questions would have missed.
  • Focus effort where the evidence was strongest: business travellers valued priority services and flexible upgrades far more than bonus points.
  • Re-measure after the changes to confirm the effect.
14

Business impact

  • The airline adjusted its proposal to protect those benefits for top tiers while simplifying lower tiers.

What changed in the business as a result of the work. Impact is described qualitatively.

15

Deliverables & next steps

  • Insight report and management presentation
  • Cleaned data file and data tables
  • Repeat the measure after changes are in place to track progress.
  • A natural follow-on question: where are supplier gaps?

Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

More aerospace case studies

  1. 01caseA passenger experience tracker for a domestic airlineA domestic airline
  2. 02caseWhat airline engineering heads expect from a maintenance partnerAn aircraft maintenance, repair and overhaul provider
  3. 03caseUnderstanding why travellers shop, or don’t, at airport storesAn airport retail concessionaire
All aerospace case studies

Want results like these?

Tell us about your objectives. We'll recommend an approach and confirm feasibility within one working day.

Request a QuoteTalk to an Expert